‭Review Published Versions 1 Vol 3 (1) : 150-161 2021
Download
Implementation of an Open Science Instruction Program for Undergraduates
: 2020 - 08 - 15
: 2020 - 12 - 11
: 2020 - 12 - 14
241 1 0
Abstract & Keywords
Abstract: The scientific, social, and economic advantages that accrue from Open Science practices—ways of doing research that emphasize reproducibility, transparency and accessibility at all stages of the research cycle—are now widely recognized in nations around the world and by international bodies such as the United Nations and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. However, program wide or coordinated instruction of undergraduate students in Open Science practices remains uncommon. At the University of British Columbia in Canada, we have started to develop a comprehensive undergraduate Open Science program that can be adapted to and woven into diverse subject curricula. We report on the context and planning of the pilot module of the program, “Open Science 101”, its implementation in first-year Biology in Fall 2019, and qualitative results of an attitudinal survey of students following their course.
Keywords: Undergraduate Education; Science Education; Open Science; Post-Secondary Science Education; Canada
Acknowledgements
We are most grateful for the support that Eric Eich, Phil Barker, and Heather Berringer have provided to our Open Science efforts and to the Fostering Open Science project, in particular.
[1]
Government of Canada: Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. Available at: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_F6765465.html. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[2]
Nemer, M.: My take on Open Science. Open government blog. Canada, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Strategic Communications and Ministerial Affairs (2018). Available at: https://open.canada.ca/en/blog/my-take-open-science. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[3]
Chan, L., et al.: Open Science beyond open access: For and with communities. A step towards the decolonization of knowledge. Canadian Commission for UNESCO’s IdeaLab (2020). Available at: https://en.ccunesco.ca/-/media/Files/Unesco/Resources/2020/07/OpenScienceDecolonizingKnowledge.pdf. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[4]
Hanna, S.: Environmental scan of OS in Canadian universities. OSF (2020). Available at: https://osf.io/gr2qs/. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[5]
Haslinger, I. M.: TU Delft strategic plan Open Science 2020-2024: Research and education in the open era. Delft University of Technology (2019). Available at:
[6]
Lopes, C., Antanes, M., Sanches, T.: Information literacy and Open Science: Before and after the new ACRL Framework. In Kurbanoğlu, S., et al. (eds.) Information Literacy in Everyday Life: The 6th European Conference, ECIL 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_23. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[7]
Ayris, P., Ignat, T.: Defining the role of libraries in the Open Science landscape: A reflection on current European practice. Open Information Science 2, 1-22 (2018)
[8]
Button, K.: Reboot undergraduate courses for reproducibility. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06692-8. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[9]
Jekel, M., et al.: How to teach Open Science principles in the undergraduate curriculum—The Hagen cumulative science project. Psychology Learning & Teaching 19(1), 91-106 (2019)
[10]
Vogel, J.: Scientists need to learn from the young (2019). Available at: https://climatenewsnetwork.net/scientists-need-to-learn-from-the-young. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[11]
Hanna S., Vis-Dunbar M., Pither, J.: Open Science 101 (First-Year Biology Implementation). OSF (2020). Available at: https://osf.io/tyf6a/. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[12]
Wilkinson M., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3, Article No. 160018 (2016)
[13]
Hanna S.: Redacted attitudinal survey student analysis report, BIOL 116, December 2019. OSF (2020). Available at: https://osf.io/nw4ud/. Accessed 11 December, 2020
[14]
Hanna, S.: Redacted attitudinal survey student analysis report, BIOL 122, December 2019. OSF (2020). Available at: https://osf.io/nq9ya/. Accessed 11 December, 2020
Article and author information
Cite As
Hanna, S., Pither, J., Vis-Dunbar, M.: Implementation of an Open Science instruction program for undergraduates. Data Intelligence 3(1), 150-161 (2021). doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00086
Sharon Hanna
S. Hanna led the writing of the paper, with contributions and revisions by M. Vis-Dunbar and J. Pither.
sharon.hanna@ubc.ca
Sharon Hanna is responsible for undergraduate Open Science (OS) instruction at UBC Okanagan. She also provides support for technical aspects of Archives digitization projects and serves as subject liaison for quantitative sciences, languages, and the Learning Design Intern program.
0000-0001-5936-4886
Jason Pither
S. Hanna led the writing of the paper, with contributions and revisions by M. Vis-Dunbar and J. Pither.
Jason Pither is an Associate Professor in Biology and principal investigator in the Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology Research Facility at UBC’s Okanagan campus. Since 2016, he has been collaborating with members of both UBC campuses to build capacity around training and support of best practices in OS.
0000-0002-7490-6839
Mathew Vis-Dunbar
S. Hanna led the writing of the paper, with contributions and revisions by M. Vis-Dunbar and J. Pither.
Mathew Vis-Dunbar is the Southern Medical Program Librarian at UBC Okanagan, where he supports researchers across the sciences to engage in open, transparent and reproducible research.
0000-0001-6541-9660
Publication records
Published: May 12, 2021 (Versions1
References
Data Intelligence