Published Versions 2 Vol 2 (1) : 199–207 2019
Download
Licensing FAIR data for reuse
87 4 0
Abstract & Keywords
Abstract: The last letter of the FAIR acronym stands for Reusability. Data and metadata should be made available with a clear and accessible usage license. But, what are the choices? How can researchers share data and allow reusability? Are all the licenses available for sharing content suitable for data? Data can be covered by different layers of copyright protection making the relationship between data and copyright particularly complex. Some research data can be considered as a work and therefore covered by full copyright while other data can be in the public domain due to their lack of originality. Moreover, a collection of data can be protected by special rights in Europe to acknowledge the investment in time and money in obtaining, presenting, arranging or verifying the data. The need of using a license when sharing data comes from the fact that, under current copyright laws, when rights exist, the absence of any legal notice must be understood as the default “all rights reserved” regime. Unless an exception applies, the authorisation of right holders is necessary for reuse. Right holders could use any text to state the reusability of data but it is advisable to use some of the existing licenses, and especially the ones that are suitable for data and databases. We hope that with this paper we can bring some clarity in relation to the rights involved when sharing research data.
Keywords: Rsearch data, Open content licensing, Copyright, Sui generis database rights, FAIR Data, Legal aspects of FAIR (especially for R)
Acknowledgements
Thomas Margoni co-coordinates the legal task force of OpenAIRE Advance, a project funded under the H2020 programme of the European Commission, project n°: 777541. We would like to thank the support of the project.
[1]
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases [Database Directive]. Available at:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0009:EN:HTML
[2]
B. Hugenholtz. Against ‘data property’.In H. Ulrich, P. Drahos, G. Ghidini (Eds.) Kritika, Essays on Intellectual Property, Vol. 3. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 48-71.
[3]
M. W. Carroll. Sharing Research Data and Intellectual Property Law: A Primer. PLoS Biology 13(8) (2015), e1002235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002235.
[4]
World Intellectual Property Organization. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (as amended on September 28, 1979). Available at: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/283698.
[5]
World Intellectual Property Organization. Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (adopted on June 27, 2013). Available at: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/treaties/textdetails/13169.
[6]
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO Copyright Treaty (adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996). Available at: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/treaties/textdetails/12740.
[7]
Communia Association. Policy Paper in reaction to the public consultation on the Database Directive. August, 2017. Available at: https://www.communia-association.org/policy-papers/policy-paper-12-reaction-public-consultation-database-directive/.
[8]
The British Horseracing Board Ltd and Others v William Hill Organization Ltd, Case C-203/02 of 9 November 2004, ECLI:EU:C:2004:695. Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-203/02.
[9]
A. Landi, M. Thompson, V. Giannuzzi, F. Bonifazi, I. Labastida, L.O. Bonino da Silva Santos & M. Roos. The “A” of FAIR – As open as possible, as closed as necessary. Data Intelligence 2(2020), 47–55. doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00027.
[10]
T. Margoni, D. Peters. Creative Commons Licenses: Empowering Open Access. Editorial Office News 9(2) (2016). Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.ismte.org/resource/resmgr/EON_Shared_Articles/Creative_Commons_Licenses.pdf.
[11]
J. Wilbanks. Public domain, copyright licenses and the freedom to integrate science. Journal of Science Communication 7(2) (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.22323/2.07020304.
[12]
17 U.S. Code § 106A. Rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/106A.
[13]
Etalab. Open License/Licence Ouverte 2.0 (2017) Available at: https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/open-licence.pdf.
[14]
United Kingdom Government. Open Government Licence for Public Sector Information, version 3.0 (2014). Available athttp://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
[15]
Europeana. Usage Guidelines for Metadata Available at: https://www.europeana.eu/portal/rights/metadata.html.
[16]
OpenAIRE. Guides for Researchers. Available at: https://www.openaire.eu/guides.
Article and author information
Cite As
I. Labastida & T. Margoni. Licensing FAIR data for reuse. Data Intelligence 2(2020), 199–207. doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00042
Ignasi Labastida
Both I.L. (ilabastida@ub.edu) and T. M. (Thomas.Margoni@glasgow.ac.uk) contributed significantly and equally to this article.
ilabastida@ub.edu
Ignasi Labastida is currently the work at the Head of the Research Unit at the University ofBarcelona’s Learning and Research Resources Centre (CRAI) where he also leads the Office for theDissemination of Knowledge. He is currently chairing the Board of SPARC Europe and he is amember of the Steering Committee of the Info and Open Access Policy Group at the League ofEuropean Research Universities (LERU). He is the co-author of the LERU Roadmap for ResearchData and the LERU Roadmap on Open Science. He has participated in several research projectsincluding LEARN, a EU H2020 project focused on helping research performing institutions inmanaging their research data.
0000-0001-7030-7030
Thomas Margoni
Both I.L. (ilabastida@ub.edu) and T. M. (Thomas.Margoni@glasgow.ac.uk) contributed significantly and equally to this article.
Publication records
Published: None (Versions2
References
Data Intelligence